CosmoCoffee Forum Index CosmoCoffee

 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch  MemberlistSmartFeed   MemberlistMemberlist    RegisterRegister 
   ProfileProfile   Log inLog in 
Arxiv New Filter | Bookmarks & clubs | Arxiv ref/author:

Relationship between nside and CAMB lmax
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CosmoCoffee Forum Index -> Computers and software
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Evan B



Joined: 27 Feb 2015
Posts: 13
Affiliation: student

PostPosted: December 12 2015  Reply with quote

For full-sky map WMAP/Planck products, 'nside' is set to nside=1024 or nside=2048. I have no problem running CAMB outputs up to lmax=2400 or so.

However, I am confused what this means when we degrade the resolution of these maps.

Let's say I degrade a map of nside=2048 (which is a map of around 50e6 pixels) to nside=16 (which is a map of 3072 total pixels). What is the maximum `lmax` at which CAMB outputs remain relevant?

Is there a rule of thumb, or a mathematical correlation here?
Back to top
View user's profile  
Antony Lewis



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 1351
Affiliation: University of Sussex

PostPosted: December 12 2015  Reply with quote

The Healpix rule of thumb (default) is lmax = 3*nside−1.
Back to top
View user's profile [ Hidden ] Visit poster's website
Evan B



Joined: 27 Feb 2015
Posts: 13
Affiliation: student

PostPosted: December 13 2015  Reply with quote

Thanks.

So, when I degrade the map's resolution, there must be significant cosmological information which is lost.

My concrete example in mind is for cosmological parameters. If I am using a sky map nside=16, and lmax=47, can I say anything about cosmological parameters?

Take WMAP, three-year results for polarization. In Appendix D, the full sky maps at set to nside=16, nside=8 to determine τ. So they used CAMB outputs up to lmax=47, lmax=23? That's very little information.

Can one use the same method to determine cosmological parameters like Ωmatter? Wouldn't you need CAMB scalar TT Cell outputs up to lmax=1500 or so?

Another concrete example I run into:
What if I am working with a heavily masked sky map, and I only access 1/4 of the sky map.

How can I think about lmax in this situation? The pixels are at a fairly high-resolution (say, nside=512, total pixels around 3e6). However, I'm only accessing less than 1e6 pixels.

There's some relationship
Back to top
View user's profile  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CosmoCoffee Forum Index -> Computers and software All times are GMT + 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group. Sponsored by WordWeb online dictionary and dictionary software.