View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Luke Hart
Joined: 13 Jul 2015 Posts: 35 Affiliation: University of Manchester
|
Posted: April 02 2017 |
|
|
I've added a parameter to the standard CosmoMC parametrization and when they converge, I'm getting flat contours where my new parameters are completely independent of the standard cosmology ones and then much narrower than the priors I set?
Any reason why my parameters could be marginalising to such a narrow final boundary?
Thanks for any help |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sunny Vagnozzi
Joined: 15 Aug 2016 Posts: 43 Affiliation: Oskar Klein Centre, Stockholm University
|
Posted: April 04 2017 |
|
|
Hi Luke! Could you please give some more details? E.g. what these parameters are (are they recombination parameters you are playing with?), what prior did you originally set, which datasets are you using, what level of convergence are you requiring?
Cheers,
Sunny |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Luke Hart
Joined: 13 Jul 2015 Posts: 35 Affiliation: University of Manchester
|
Posted: April 05 2017 |
|
|
Update: Found! It seems to have originated from the proposal distribution so I tweaked that a little bit and now it seems to be giving actual covariances rather than just remaining degenerate to the code. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|