### GetDist: samples.loglikes actually chi2?

Posted:

**July 02 2021**Hello,

I have been comparing samples.loglikes values with the logL values for the same chains read in with the 'anesthetic' package and find that getdist version gives values that are higher by a factor of 2. I also saw that in the getdist loadChains function loglikes are defined as "loglikes: if loading from arrays of samples, corresponding list of arrays of -2 log(likelihood)".

I have tried this logL getdist vs anesthetic comparison for chains produced with CosmoMC and nested sampling chains obtained with CosmoSIS and got the same result.

In all the documentation I was able to find samples.loglikes is described as -log(likelihood) or chi2/2 - is it at all possible that this might not be the case for certain chains or that I may have misunderstood the documentation somehow and samples.loglikes is actually -2log(likelihood) or chi2?

Sorry for perhaps a silly question but I would really appreciate a clarification!

Thanks a lot!

I have been comparing samples.loglikes values with the logL values for the same chains read in with the 'anesthetic' package and find that getdist version gives values that are higher by a factor of 2. I also saw that in the getdist loadChains function loglikes are defined as "loglikes: if loading from arrays of samples, corresponding list of arrays of -2 log(likelihood)".

I have tried this logL getdist vs anesthetic comparison for chains produced with CosmoMC and nested sampling chains obtained with CosmoSIS and got the same result.

In all the documentation I was able to find samples.loglikes is described as -log(likelihood) or chi2/2 - is it at all possible that this might not be the case for certain chains or that I may have misunderstood the documentation somehow and samples.loglikes is actually -2log(likelihood) or chi2?

Sorry for perhaps a silly question but I would really appreciate a clarification!

Thanks a lot!