CAMB/CosmoMC : Modified growth

 Posts: 17
 Joined: February 11 2014
 Affiliation: IRAP Toulouse
CAMB/CosmoMC : Modified growth
Hello all,
I would like to know how hard it would be to implement the "gamma" parametrization of the growth rate (i.e. f = \Omega_m(z)^{\gamma(z)} ) inside CAMB/CosmoMC, in order to study the impact of a modified growth rate on the CMB power spectrum (through the ISW effect & lensing).
I understand that CAMB evolves the full linear perturbation theory equations, and that at high redshift there are effects from radiation and decaying modes, and the gamma approximation breaks down. There is also the effect of massive neutrinos which introduce a k dependence on the growth factor.
Supposing no massive neutrinos, could we somehow, at a certain late enough redshift, switch from the full perturbations equations to the gamma parametrization for the growth factor/rate ?
Thanks in advance !
Stephane
I would like to know how hard it would be to implement the "gamma" parametrization of the growth rate (i.e. f = \Omega_m(z)^{\gamma(z)} ) inside CAMB/CosmoMC, in order to study the impact of a modified growth rate on the CMB power spectrum (through the ISW effect & lensing).
I understand that CAMB evolves the full linear perturbation theory equations, and that at high redshift there are effects from radiation and decaying modes, and the gamma approximation breaks down. There is also the effect of massive neutrinos which introduce a k dependence on the growth factor.
Supposing no massive neutrinos, could we somehow, at a certain late enough redshift, switch from the full perturbations equations to the gamma parametrization for the growth factor/rate ?
Thanks in advance !
Stephane

 Posts: 97
 Joined: March 19 2010
 Affiliation: The University of Texas at Dallas
 Contact:
CAMB/CosmoMC : Modified growth
I would suggest against implementing the gamma parameterization if trying to get its effect on the CMB spectrum. Gamma is not entirely suitable for looking for modifications to gravity and comparing with the CMB.
There are a few different codes available to look at modified growth parameters and how they affect the CMB.
1. ISiTGR: http://isit.gr  This code uses a few parameterizations for the modified gravity parameters so that you can have different choices of how they vary in time and scale.
2. MGCAMB: http://aliojjati.github.io/MGCAMB/mgcamb.html  This is similar to ISiTGR but has slightly different ways of parameterizing the MG parameters and does include an input to vary gamma, but as i discussed earlier, using gamma will not be as accurate or as realistic as using the other MG parameters.
3. EFTCAMB: http://eftcamb.org/  Uses an effective field theory approach to modifying growth. This is nice because it does not assume the quasistatic approximation used in the previous two modified codes.
There are a few different codes available to look at modified growth parameters and how they affect the CMB.
1. ISiTGR: http://isit.gr  This code uses a few parameterizations for the modified gravity parameters so that you can have different choices of how they vary in time and scale.
2. MGCAMB: http://aliojjati.github.io/MGCAMB/mgcamb.html  This is similar to ISiTGR but has slightly different ways of parameterizing the MG parameters and does include an input to vary gamma, but as i discussed earlier, using gamma will not be as accurate or as realistic as using the other MG parameters.
3. EFTCAMB: http://eftcamb.org/  Uses an effective field theory approach to modifying growth. This is nice because it does not assume the quasistatic approximation used in the previous two modified codes.

 Posts: 17
 Joined: February 11 2014
 Affiliation: IRAP Toulouse
CAMB/CosmoMC : Modified growth
Hello Jason and thank you for your answer !
I was aware of two of the three codes you mentioned, but thank you for the summary !
I'll check them out and see if they suit my needs.
Cheers !
S.
I was aware of two of the three codes you mentioned, but thank you for the summary !
I'll check them out and see if they suit my needs.
Cheers !
S.

 Posts: 11
 Joined: March 21 2016
 Affiliation: Leinweber Center for Theoretical Physics, University of Michigan
 Contact:
Re: CAMB/CosmoMC : Modified growth
Sorry for digging up this topic, but here we're thinking of doing something similar. I'm unsure of how this can be potentially a bad idea. Could someone clarify/elaborate a bit more?