Computation of variable Theta, not self-consistent ?

Use of Cobaya. camb, CLASS, cosmomc, compilers, etc.
Post Reply
Karsten Jedamzik
Posts: 5
Joined: November 30 2011
Affiliation: University of Montpellier

Computation of variable Theta, not self-consistent ?

Post by Karsten Jedamzik » December 30 2011

Hi,

It seems to me that the variable Theta is computed by using the Hu & Sugiyama
recombination redshift zstar approximation, as opposed to computing zstar directly
from CAMB (recfast). Is this correct ?

If correct, that implies that when derived parameters, for example H, are computed
the error in the zstar approximation propagates into H. This would be particularly
bad for alternative models where zstar does not follow the Hu & Sugiyama approximation.

I assume however, that the liklihood of a particular parameter combination is computed
directly from the observational data, and the CAMB results, such that a posteriori
probabilities are correctly computed, independent of the zstar assumption.

Could somebody comment, thanks

Karsten

jayanti prasad
Posts: 14
Joined: October 21 2010
Affiliation: Inter-University Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics (IUCAA)
Contact:

Computation of variable Theta, not self-consistent ?

Post by jayanti prasad » December 30 2011

I also want to ask the same.. check my last question...

Post Reply