CosmoCoffee Forum Index CosmoCoffee

 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch  MemberlistSmartFeed   MemberlistMemberlist    RegisterRegister 
   ProfileProfile   Log inLog in 
Arxiv New Filter | Bookmarks & clubs | Arxiv ref/author:

[astro-ph/0512218] Weak Gravitational Lensing of High-Redshift 21 cm Power Spectra
Authors:Kaisey S. Mandel, Matias Zaldarriaga (Harvard)
Abstract:We describe the effects of weak gravitational lensing by cosmological large scale structure on the diffuse emission of 21 centimeter radiation from neutral hydrogen at high redshifts during the era of reionization. The ability to observe radial information through the frequency, and thus three-dimensional regions of the background radiation at different redshifts, suggests that 21 cm studies may provide a useful context for studying weak lensing effects. We focus on the gravitational lensing effects on both the angular power spectra and the intrinsic, three-dimensional power spectra. We present a new approach for calculating the weak lensing signature based on integrating differential Fourier-space shells of the deflection field and approximating the magnification matrix. This method is applied to reionization models of the 21 cm spectra up to small angular scales over a range in redshift. The effect on the angular power spectrum is typically < 1% on small angular scales, and very small on scales corresponding to the feature imprinted by reionization bubbles, due to the near-scale invariance of the angular power spectrum of the 21 cm signal on these scales. We describe the expected effect of weak lensing on three-dimensional 21 cm power spectra, and show that lensing creates aspherical perturbations to the intrinsic power spectrum which depend on the polar angle of the wavevector. The effect on the 3D power spectrum is < 1% on scales k < 0.1 h/Mpc, but can be > 1% for highly inclined modes for k > 1 h/Mpc. The angular variation of the lensing effect on these scales is well described by a quartic polynomial in the cosine of the polar angle. The detection of the gravitational lensing effects on 21 cm power spectra will require very sensitive, high resolution observations by future low-frequency radio arrays.
[PDF] [PS] [BibTex] [Bookmark]

Post new topic   Reply to topic    CosmoCoffee Forum Index -> arXiv papers
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Antony Lewis

Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 1327
Affiliation: University of Sussex

PostPosted: December 15 2005  Reply with quote

This interesting paper includes a new way for computing the lensing effect on a power spectrum applicable when the power spectrum has lots of small scale power (unlike the CMB, the 21cm spectrum is nearly flat on small scales). They use this and show that the lensing effect on the 21cm power spectrum is very small and hard to detect.

This contrasts with using the shapes of resolved structures observed in 21cm (e.g. astro-ph/0305387), which is claimed to give very powerful constraints. I presume this corresponds to non-Gaussian signals which are not considered in this paper.

Regarding the new method for computing the lensing effect on the power sectrum: they make fully justified criticisms of the series expansion approach, which is indeed very poor in general. However the method of Seljak working with the correlation functions (astro-ph/9505109, reviewed recently in astro-ph/0502425) is in principle non-perturbative and much more accurate. Indeed in Sec 2.5 the authors say "what is physically important is the difference between the deflection angles at the two points", which is exactly what the Seljak method uses: it is based on a calculation of the correlation function of the difference of deflection angles (equivalent to shear and convergence only in the limit of small separation). I would therefore be interested to see whether Seljak's much simpler method would actually work at least as well.

The Seljak result for the lensed power spectrum can be written exactly as
\tilde{C}_{l'} = \int r dr \int l dl J_0(l' r) C_l e^{-l^2\sigma^2(r)/2} \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty I_n(l^2 C_{gl,2}(r)/2) J_{2 n}(l r)
(this form in terms of regular and modified Bessel functions is new - it corresponds to re-summing the series expansion given in the Seljak paper). Here σ2(r) and Cgl,2(r) measure the correlation of the deflection angles, and for small r are given by κ2 r2 and κ2 r2/2 respectively. This full result is non-perturbative in both terms, though the lowest series expansion given in Seljak is probably accurate at some level up to l ~ 104. The number of terms you need to keep in n is I suspect quite small: the Bessel functions are very small at high |n| unless the argument is large, so I'd have thought keeping just a few terms would be sufficient to compute the lensed 21cm spectrum accurately up to l ~ 105, though I haven't tried it. In principle the integral from which this result came could also be calculated directly numerically.

Of course the new method is interesting in its own right (though quite complicated!) even if other methods are available. Particularly nice to see the new result for a lensed white spectrum: the ~ 1+ 4 κ2 scaling has been neglected previously.

One further comment: it's not clear to me from Fig. 1 that the convergence power κ2 is actually very small (as stated in 2.2.1), though to a low cut off it would be. Because the spectrum is flattish on small scales in general it depends on what happens on small scales off the right of the figure. I think integrated up values of 0.1 are not unreasonable if very small scale power is included. So it's not neccessarily clear that expansions in κ are in general a very good idea unless they are otherwise regularlized (which they probably are).
Back to top
View user's profile [ Hidden ] Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CosmoCoffee Forum Index -> arXiv papers All times are GMT + 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group. Sponsored by WordWeb online dictionary and dictionary software.