
CosmoCoffee

Authors:  P. Martineau, R. Brandenberger 
Abstract:  We present a solution to the dark energy problem in terms of the Effective
Energy Momentum Tensor (EMT) of cosmological perturbations. The approach makes
use of the gravitational backreaction of long wavelength (superHubble)
fluctuation modes on the background metric. Our results indicate that,
following preheating, the energy density associated with backreaction is
subdominant and behaves as a tracker during the radiation era. At the onset of
matter domination, however, the effects of backreaction begin to grow relative
to the matter density and the associated equation of state quickly approaches
that of a cosmological constant. Using standard values for the preheating
temperature and the amplitude of the inflaton following preheating, we show
that this mechanism leads to a very natural explanation of dark energy. We
comment on other recent attempts to explain the dark energy using backreaction
and their relation to our work. 

[PDF]
[PS] [BibTex] [Bookmark]

View previous topic :: View next topic 
Author 
Message 
Anze Slosar
Joined: 24 Sep 2004 Posts: 205 Affiliation: Brookhaven National Laboratory

Posted: October 19 2005 


Here we have another paper doing the cosmological constant from backreaction. This time the authors use the suberHubble fluctuations in the scalar field rather than gradient terms of energy momentum tensor used previously, so it is a fundamentally different approach.
In the conclusions the authors address the problem of causality by saying it is easy to refute, because "Our formalism is based entirely on the equations of GR, which are generally covariant...", which still leaves me slighlty nervous (previous approaches were also based on covariant GR and turned out to have many problems), but the proposed mechanism is a very interesting possiblity anyway... 

Back to top 


Mustafa Amin
Joined: 21 Oct 2004 Posts: 1 Affiliation: Kavli Institute for Cosmology at Cambridge

Posted: October 20 2005 


A recent paper by R.Wald [grqc/0509108] seems to claim you cannot do this... 

Back to top 


Niayesh Afshordi
Joined: 17 Dec 2004 Posts: 62 Affiliation: Perimeter Institute/ University of Waterloo

Posted: November 02 2005 


I finally got to read through this paper.
At first look, the backreaction jargon of this paper can be simply translated to a quintessence with its initial condition set by inflation.
However, in closer reading, the treatment seems to have more serious problems:
1 theory studied here, undergoes coherent oscillations after the end of inflation, and finally decoheres into a radiation fluid, rather than a uniform field with small inhomogeneities, as assumed here. Eventually, theory can only act as a radiation fluid and not quintessence.
2 field, which is assumed to be the inflaton, at least partially decays into radiation at reheating, which is not considered at all.
3 The first order terms cannot be simply averaged to zero at the 2nd order level.
4 Finally, G_{0i} equation cannot be used to relate metric to field fluctuations, when the scalar field is subdominant, as is the case in the matter era.
All this should be added to the fact that WMAP seems to have ruled out as a possible inflationary scenario. 

Back to top 




You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum

