CosmoCoffee Forum Index CosmoCoffee

 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch  MemberlistSmartFeed   MemberlistMemberlist    RegisterRegister 
   ProfileProfile   Log inLog in 
Arxiv New Filter | Bookmarks & clubs | Arxiv ref/author:

astro-ph split
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CosmoCoffee Forum Index -> Teaching, Papers and Presentations
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Syksy Rasanen



Joined: 02 Mar 2005
Posts: 128
Affiliation: University of Helsinki

PostPosted: September 14 2005  Reply with quote

Following up the cosmo-ph thread (http://cosmocoffee.info/viewtopic.php?t=234 ): arXiv has announced the new classification scheme (a week ago, but I didn't notice until now): http://arxiv.org/new/physics.html . There are to be four "super-sections":

physics.AA Astrophysics
physics.HH High-Energy Physics
physics.SS Condensed Matter and AMO
physics.NN Nuclear Physics,

each divided into categories. For astrophysics, the categories are Cosmology, Galaxies, Stars and finally Earth and Planetary Physics, as well as the amalgamate Instrumentation and Data Analysis.

I personally think that these changes are excellent. (To my particular delight, the cosmology part in gr-qc has also been removed, leaving it to cover "general relativity and related theories, numerical and experimental results, black holes, gravity waves, quantum gravity, quantum field theory in curved space-time".)
Back to top
View user's profile [ Hidden ]
Alessandro Melchiorri



Joined: 24 Sep 2004
Posts: 123
Affiliation: University of Rome

PostPosted: December 18 2005  Reply with quote

Honestly I think this modification is completely useless... we will read just the supersection astrophysics.AA.

Cheers
Alessandro
Back to top
View user's profile   Visit poster's website
Syksy Rasanen



Joined: 02 Mar 2005
Posts: 128
Affiliation: University of Helsinki

PostPosted: December 18 2005  Reply with quote

Personally, I find it useful to be able to exclude stellar and planetary physics as well as instrumentation from the list of papers to browse. And I doubt whether people doing galaxy physics have a daily interest in brane cosmology, for example. For another, at the moment the placement of cosmology papers is pretty unclear: whether to put in hep-ph, hep-th, astro-ph or gr-qc seems pretty arbitrary.
Back to top
View user's profile [ Hidden ]
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CosmoCoffee Forum Index -> Teaching, Papers and Presentations All times are GMT + 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group. Sponsored by WordWeb online dictionary and dictionary software.