View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Jack Sparrow
Joined: 12 May 2016 Posts: 14 Affiliation: HK
|
Posted: June 06 2017 |
|
|
When I use the getdist to plot the ns-r diagram (base_nrun_r_plikHM_TT_lowTEB_BKP), I found that the r of solid line is almost 0.12,
While in the paper
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1502.01589.pdf
There is a similar plot, Fig.21. There, the corresponding value is around 0.1.
I am curious why there is a difference based on the same data. Can somebody explian? Thanks!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Antony Lewis
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 Posts: 1333 Affiliation: University of Sussex
|
Posted: June 07 2017 |
|
|
Fig 21 does not marginalize over running. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jack Sparrow
Joined: 12 May 2016 Posts: 14 Affiliation: HK
|
Posted: June 07 2017 |
|
|
Thanks!! But would you mind being more specific? What do you mean running? What should I do if I want to get a similar figure as Fig.21?
Thanks! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jason Dossett
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 Posts: 97 Affiliation: The University of Texas at Dallas
|
Posted: June 08 2017 |
|
|
Running refers to running of the spectral index (nrun). In the chains you used nrun was varied (and thus could be marginalized over). To produce figure 21, nrun was not varied so the constraints obtained will be slightly different. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|