COSMOMC: all_l_exact data format
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: November 26 2008
- Affiliation: Inter University Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: June 08 2007
- Affiliation: CEA
COSMOMC: all_l_exact data format
Hi All,
Does the [tex]C_\ell[/tex]s in the planck.dat file have to be necessarily smooth? Or can we have a simulated [tex]C_\ell[/tex] from a CMB map? I appreciate the help.
Thanks
Paniez
Does the [tex]C_\ell[/tex]s in the planck.dat file have to be necessarily smooth? Or can we have a simulated [tex]C_\ell[/tex] from a CMB map? I appreciate the help.
Thanks
Paniez
-
- Posts: 1943
- Joined: September 23 2004
- Affiliation: University of Sussex
- Contact:
Re: COSMOMC: all_l_exact data format
You can use a simulation, just don't expect the posteriors to peak at exactly the simulation input values.
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: June 08 2007
- Affiliation: CEA
COSMOMC: all_l_exact data format
Thank you. So, that means I should expect some bias? I can trust the errors though?
Paniez
Paniez
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: February 08 2005
COSMOMC: all_l_exact data format
I'm a bit confused -- why, in the example code, does
one write C_TT+N_l and C_EE+noiseFac*N_l, but
does not include any noise term when writing out
C_TE?
one write C_TT+N_l and C_EE+noiseFac*N_l, but
does not include any noise term when writing out
C_TE?
-
- Posts: 1943
- Joined: September 23 2004
- Affiliation: University of Sussex
- Contact:
Re: COSMOMC: all_l_exact data format
Just assuming the simple case where there is no noise correlation between Q/U and T.
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: November 26 2005
- Affiliation: McGill U.
COSMOMC: all_l_exact data format
Hello,
I am trying to use the all_l_exact format on CosmoMC with the above procedure with some C_l table produced by the Healpix package anafast, and it works well :) .
One simple question: does it work only for full-sky data or should I do something more complicated (such as using planck_like.f90) when I put a mask with anafast on my sky maps?
And by the way, what is the planck_like.f90 routine doing exactly and how do I use it? (I cannot find any instructions on the web) ...
thanks a lot for your help!
Alessio
I am trying to use the all_l_exact format on CosmoMC with the above procedure with some C_l table produced by the Healpix package anafast, and it works well :) .
One simple question: does it work only for full-sky data or should I do something more complicated (such as using planck_like.f90) when I put a mask with anafast on my sky maps?
And by the way, what is the planck_like.f90 routine doing exactly and how do I use it? (I cannot find any instructions on the web) ...
thanks a lot for your help!
Alessio
-
- Posts: 1943
- Joined: September 23 2004
- Affiliation: University of Sussex
- Contact:
Re: COSMOMC: all_l_exact data format
Planck_like implements the approximation of 0801.0554 as well as simple schemes like full-sky and Gaussian. You probably should use something that accounts for the covariance when using cut-sky data.
For sample data files see the bottom of
http://cosmologist.info/weightmixer/
or the python exact simulation script supplied with most recent cosmomc.
For sample data files see the bottom of
http://cosmologist.info/weightmixer/
or the python exact simulation script supplied with most recent cosmomc.
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: November 26 2005
- Affiliation: McGill U.
COSMOMC: all_l_exact data format
Thanks for the answer.
Though, I am not sure if I understand the way to preceed. How do I tell to cosmomc that there is nontrivial covariance due to cut-sky?
Moreover, in the all_l_exact format why is there an f_sky column if this is valid only for full sky?
cheers
Though, I am not sure if I understand the way to preceed. How do I tell to cosmomc that there is nontrivial covariance due to cut-sky?
Moreover, in the all_l_exact format why is there an f_sky column if this is valid only for full sky?
cheers
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: November 26 2005
- Affiliation: McGill U.
COSMOMC: all_l_exact data format
I guess I should probably use the .newdat format for the data, which is related to this:
http://cosmocoffee.info/viewtopic.php?p=4068
and to this:
http://www.astro.caltech.edu/~tjp/CBI/d ... index.html
Could anyone clarify if this is the right way to proceed and how this format can be used for mock data? (there are no answers to the questions in the above link)
thanks again
http://cosmocoffee.info/viewtopic.php?p=4068
and to this:
http://www.astro.caltech.edu/~tjp/CBI/d ... index.html
Could anyone clarify if this is the right way to proceed and how this format can be used for mock data? (there are no answers to the questions in the above link)
thanks again
-
- Posts: 97
- Joined: March 19 2010
- Affiliation: The University of Texas at Dallas
- Contact:
Re: COSMOMC: all_l_exact data format
Hi,Antony Lewis wrote:Planck_like implements the approximation of 0801.0554 as well as simple schemes like full-sky and Gaussian. You probably should use something that accounts for the covariance when using cut-sky data.
For sample data files see the bottom of
http://cosmologist.info/weightmixer/
or the python exact simulation script supplied with most recent cosmomc.
I am trying to use the makePerfectForcast.py python script to create a new dataset for some future simulated data. I understand how to produce the input files:
lensedTotClFileRoot and lensPotential.
I am however unsure how exactly to construct the reconNoise input file. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Jason
-
- Posts: 1943
- Joined: September 23 2004
- Affiliation: University of Sussex
- Contact:
Re: COSMOMC: all_l_exact data format
You only need reconNoise if you want to include CMB lensing reconstruction (in which case it is the reconstruction noise variance, which you can calculate for isotropic full sky case using standard result involving 3j sum).
-
- Posts: 97
- Joined: March 19 2010
- Affiliation: The University of Texas at Dallas
- Contact:
COSMOMC: all_l_exact data format
Thanks Antony.