CosmoCoffee Forum Index CosmoCoffee

 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch  MemberlistSmartFeed   MemberlistMemberlist    RegisterRegister 
   ProfileProfile   Log inLog in 
Arxiv New Filter | Bookmarks & clubs | Arxiv ref/author:

[1001.4000] Absence of significant cross-correlation between WMAP and SDSS
 
Authors:M. Lopez-Corredoira, F. Sylos Labini, J. Betancort-Rijo
Abstract:AIMS. Several authors have claimed to detect a significant cross-correlation between microwave WMAP anisotropies and the SDSS galaxy distribution. We repeat these analyses to determine the different cross-correlation uncertainties caused by re-sampling errors and field-to-field fluctuations. The first type of error concerns overlapping sky regions, while the second type concerns non-overlapping sky regions. METHODS. To measure the re-sampling errors, we use bootstrap and jack-knife techniques. For the field-to-field fluctuations, we use three methods: 1) evaluation of the dispersion in the cross-correlation when correlating separated regions of WMAP with the original region of SDSS; 2) use of mock Monte Carlo WMAP maps; 3) a new method (developed in this article), which measures the error as a function of the integral of the product of the self-correlations for each map. RESULTS. The average cross-correlation for b>30 deg. is significantly stronger than the re-sampling errors--both the jack-knife and bootstrap techniques provide similar results--but it is of the order of the field-to-field fluctuations. This is confirmed by the cross-correlation between anisotropies and galaxies in more than the half of the sample being null within re-sampling errors. CONCLUSIONS. Re-sampling methods underestimate the errors. Field-to-field fluctuations dominate the detected signals. The ratio of signal to re-sampling errors is larger than unity in a way that strongly depends on the selected sky region. We therefore conclude that there is no evidence yet of a significant detection of the integrated Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) effect. Hence, the value of Omega_\Lambda ~ 0.8 obtained by the authors who assumed they were observing the ISW effect would appear to have originated from noise analysis
[PDF] [PS] [BibTex] [Bookmark]

Post new topic   Reply to topic    CosmoCoffee Forum Index -> arXiv papers
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Syksy Rasanen



Joined: 02 Mar 2005
Posts: 127
Affiliation: University of Helsinki

PostPosted: February 24 2011  Reply with quote

The authors claim that the cross-correlation between the CMB and large-scale structure is not statistically significant. Such a detection is usually interpreted as being due to the ISW effect, which is a prediction of dark energy models. (More generally, any cosmological models other than matter-dominated spatially flat FRW predict an ISW effect, though the quantitative details of course vary.)

The authors consider WMAP5 and SDSS DR7 data. They argue that the intrinsic field-to-field fluctuations are larger than the signal and that thus there is o significant detection. I don't quite follow the analysis, and would be grateful if more knowleadgle people would share their views.
Back to top
View user's profile [ Hidden ]
Maciej Bilicki



Joined: 12 May 2010
Posts: 19
Affiliation: University of Cape Town

PostPosted: February 25 2011  Reply with quote

I'd like to draw your attention to yet another paper where no significant detection of the Sachs-Wolfe effect is claimed, Francis & Peacock (2010) 0909.2494. They cross-correlated CMB with 2MASS. They say even that it might be that the S-W effect could remain undetected in a LambdaCDM universe, even if present!
Back to top
View user's profile [ Hidden ] Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CosmoCoffee Forum Index -> arXiv papers All times are GMT + 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group. Sponsored by WordWeb online dictionary and dictionary software.