Hi,
I've noticed (now that I need it) that the option to use H_0 and z_re parametrization (PARAMETRIZATION flag and params_H.f90 or params.f90) is not included anymore in this version.
Is this alternative parametrization not working with the newer CosmoMC versions or you just didn't update it because you didn't need it?
Ana
CosmoMC 2010 - alternative parametrization
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: March 26 2006
- Affiliation: Institute for Space Sciences
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 1944
- Joined: September 23 2004
- Affiliation: University of Sussex
- Contact:
Re: CosmoMC 2010 - alternative parametrization
It would probably work with some modifications, eg. adding a SetParamNames function similar to that in the new params_CMB. But I think params_CMB is usually more efficient.
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: March 26 2006
- Affiliation: Institute for Space Sciences
- Contact:
CosmoMC 2010 - alternative parametrization
Thank you for the answer Antony, I'll do this and see how it works.
Indeed params_CMB.f90 is more efficient; but now I am using some data and a model that for some reason lowers the H0 value almost out of the WMAP error bars unless I change its hard coded priors so I thought using H0 parametrization would be a good test to see what is happening.
Ana
Indeed params_CMB.f90 is more efficient; but now I am using some data and a model that for some reason lowers the H0 value almost out of the WMAP error bars unless I change its hard coded priors so I thought using H0 parametrization would be a good test to see what is happening.
Ana