CosmoCoffee Forum Index CosmoCoffee

 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch  MemberlistSmartFeed   MemberlistMemberlist    RegisterRegister 
   ProfileProfile   Log inLog in 
Arxiv New Filter | Bookmarks & clubs | Arxiv ref/author:

Linear Evolution in CAMB
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CosmoCoffee Forum Index -> Computers and software
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Matthew Lewandowski



Joined: 10 May 2016
Posts: 2
Affiliation: Stanford University

PostPosted: May 10 2016  Reply with quote

I have tried to perform the following simple sanity check in CAMB, so as to better understand what is included in the output. Basically, I am comparing the total matter power spectrum (adiabatic mode) outputted by CAMB at two different times with the linear evolution (D2) from one time to the other. I think that these two things should exactly match, since CAMB is solving the linear equations.

In equations, I think that

\left( \frac{D(z_1)}{D(z_2)} \right)^2 \frac{P_{CAMB}^{tot.} (k , z_2)}{P_{CAMB}^{tot.} (k , z_1)}

should be equal to 1 for all k that are inside the horizon, and as long as z1 and z2 are within matter domination. The D(z) here is the linear growth factor which is a solution for linearized continuity and Euler equations. The result was that there is a 4% difference from z = 100 to z = 0, and a 0.5% difference from z = 10 to z = 0, in the range k / h from 0.1 to 100

Does anyone know what's going on here?
Back to top
View user's profile  
Antony Lewis



Joined: 23 Sep 2004
Posts: 1301
Affiliation: University of Sussex

PostPosted: May 10 2016  Reply with quote

At high redshift there are effects from radiation and decaying modes. You may have a massive neutrino contributions (massive neutrinos also affect the background evolution, so may depend on how you defined D(z)). And as k gets large you can start to see linear effects of baryons (pressure of baryons becomes large at k~500).
Back to top
View user's profile [ Hidden ] Visit poster's website
Matthew Lewandowski



Joined: 10 May 2016
Posts: 2
Affiliation: Stanford University

PostPosted: May 19 2016  Reply with quote

Hi Anthony, thank you for your quick reply. I am now pretty sure that the mismatch was indeed due to radiation effects. At z=100, these can have percent level effects, and I think that is what I was seeing. Thanks!

Matt
Back to top
View user's profile  
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CosmoCoffee Forum Index -> Computers and software All times are GMT + 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group. Sponsored by WordWeb online dictionary and dictionary software.