Omega_k and COSMOMC

Use of Cobaya. camb, CLASS, cosmomc, compilers, etc.
Post Reply
David Parkinson
Posts: 23
Joined: January 19 2005
Affiliation: KASI
Contact:

Omega_k and COSMOMC

Post by David Parkinson » April 25 2005

In the routine in cosmomc that calculates the likelihood, there is a prior on the curvature, such that Omega_k(min) =-0.3 and Omega_k(max) = +0.3. I am interested in running over a much larger prior range (-0.9 up to +1.0). Does anyone know if this prior can be extended safely, or if major modifications need to be made to the routine?

Anze Slosar
Posts: 183
Joined: September 24 2004
Affiliation: Brookhaven National Laboratory
Contact:

Omega_k and COSMOMC

Post by Anze Slosar » April 25 2005

I think that for a very closed universe, camb will barf:

chi >= pi in closed model not supported

and give up.

Antony Lewis
Posts: 1936
Joined: September 23 2004
Affiliation: University of Sussex
Contact:

Re: Omega_k and COSMOMC

Post by Antony Lewis » April 25 2005

This is true. On the other hand \chi=\pi corresponds to the acoustic peak being at l=0, so with any data it is unlikely to go anywhere near there. So it will probably work for a significantly wider range of \Omega_K if you want to just edit that prior. (of course the curvature may then be implicitly bounded by the prior on H_0 and the age, so you may need to change them too).

On the other hand I haven't actually tested it on large |\Omega_K| models for years.

Anze Slosar
Posts: 183
Joined: September 24 2004
Affiliation: Brookhaven National Laboratory
Contact:

Re: Omega_k and COSMOMC

Post by Anze Slosar » April 27 2005

Antony Lewis wrote:This is true. On the other hand \chi=\pi corresponds to the acoustic peak being at l=0, so with any data it is unlikely to go anywhere near there.
Yes, but it is enough to propose to such place for camb to stop, even though the sample would have been rejected. I remember that with pre-WMAP data this was stopping my chains even though it was clear at the time that there is no peak at l=0... So with big enough proposal width it might happen.

Post Reply