I am trying to use Cosmomc/GetDist to go through the test example. After performing the following line "mpirun -np 8 ./cosmomc test.ini", I get
Code: Select all
Number of MPI processes: 8
Random seeds: 7991, 26877 rand_inst: 6
Random seeds: 7560, 26884 rand_inst: 1
Using clik with likelihood file ./data/clik/CAMspec_v6.2TN_2013_02_26_dist.clik
Random seeds: 8331, 26891 rand_inst: 8
Random seeds: 8296, 26897 rand_inst: 7
Random seeds: 7869, 26904 rand_inst: 2
Random seeds: 8232, 26911 rand_inst: 5
Random seeds: 8200, 26918 rand_inst: 4
Random seeds: 8163, 26924 rand_inst: 3
Using clik with likelihood file data/clik/CAMspec_v6.2TN_2013_02_26_dist.clik
----
clik version 5887 MAKEFILE
CAMspec e61cec87-3a37-43ca-8ed1-edcfcaf5c00a
Checking likelihood 'data/clik/CAMspec_v6.2TN_2013_02_26_dist.clik' on test data. got -3908.71 expected -3908.71 (diff -3.76099e-08)
----
TT from l=0 to l= 2500
Clik will run with the following nuisance parameters:
A_ps_100
A_ps_143
A_ps_217
A_cib_143
A_cib_217
A_sz
r_ps
r_cib
n_Dl_cib
cal_100
cal_217
xi_sz_cib
A_ksz
Bm_1_1
Using clik with likelihood file data/clik/commander_v4.1_lm49.clik
----
clik version 5887 MAKEFILE
gibbs d462e865-e178-449a-ac29-5c16ab9b38f5
Checking likelihood 'data/clik/commander_v4.1_lm49.clik' on test data. got 3.2784 expected 3.2784 (diff -2.55579e-10)
----
TT from l=0 to l= 49
Using clik with likelihood file data/clik/lowlike_v222.clik
Initializing Planck low-likelihood, version v2.1
----
clik version 5887 MAKEFILE
lowlike "lowlike v222"
Checking likelihood 'data/clik/lowlike_v222.clik' on test data. got -1007.04 expected -1007.04 (diff -1.97381e-05)
----
TT from l=0 to l= 32
EE from l=0 to l= 32
BB from l=0 to l= 32
TE from l=0 to l= 32
adding parameters for: lowlike_v222.clik
adding parameters for: commander_v4.1_lm49.clik
adding parameters for: CAMspec_v6.2TN_2013_02_26_dist.clik
WARNING: zero padding ext cls in LoadFiducialHighLTemplate
Computing tensors: F
Doing CMB lensing: T
Doing non-linear Pk: 0
lmax = 6500
lmax_computed_cl = 2500
max_eta_k = 6625.00000000000
transfer kmax = 0.800000011920929
Number of C_ls = 4
Fast divided into 1 blocks
Varying 20 parameters ( 6 slow ( 2 semi-slow), 14 fast ( 0 semi-fast))
starting Monte-Carlo
Initialising BBN Helium data...
Code: Select all
Initialising BBN Helium data...
Chain:0 drag accpt: 0.4054054 fast/slow 44.40298 slow: 67
Chain:0 drag accpt: 0.4316547 fast/slow 49.45312 slow: 128
Chain:0 drag accpt: 0.4265403 fast/slow 50.03608 slow: 194
Chain1, MPI done 'burn', Samples =243, like = 4905.653
Time: 2036.12491989136 output lines= 101
slow changes 156 semi-slow changes 66
MPI_Min_Sample_Update 88 243
1 all_burn done
1 DoUpdates
Chain:0 drag accpt: 0.4137931 fast/slow 50.20076 slow: 264
Code: Select all
./getdist disttest.ini
Code: Select all
./getdist disttest.ini
skipped unused params: omegak mnu nnu yhe Alens nrun r
reading chains/test_1.txt
reading chains/test_2.txt
reading chains/test_3.txt
reading chains/test_4.txt
reading chains/test_5.txt
reading chains/test_6.txt
reading chains/test_7.txt
reading chains/test_8.txt
outlier fraction 9.0909094E-02
Number of chains used = 8
WARNING: Gelman-Rubin covariance not invertible
RL: Not enough samples to estimate convergence stats
forrtl: info (58): format syntax error at or near f8.3," \Omega_b h^2")
forrtl: severe (62): syntax error in format, unit 40, file /n/home01/vbuza/cosmomc/cosmomc/test.converge
Image PC Routine Line Source
getdist 0000000000543E3E Unknown Unknown Unknown
getdist 00000000005428D6 Unknown Unknown Unknown
getdist 00000000004F0462 Unknown Unknown Unknown
getdist 00000000004A12FC Unknown Unknown Unknown
getdist 00000000004A081C Unknown Unknown Unknown
getdist 00000000004E030B Unknown Unknown Unknown
getdist 000000000046AA37 Unknown Unknown Unknown
getdist 000000000045178A Unknown Unknown Unknown
getdist 000000000040A8DC Unknown Unknown Unknown
libc.so.6 00000036D6E1ECDD Unknown Unknown Unknown
getdist 000000000040A7D9 Unknown Unknown Unknown
Code: Select all
"WARNING: Gelman-Rubin covariance not invertible"
but unfortunately I don't understand the solution. Could you please let me know if it's the same problem, or if the fact that there's a difference between 1 nodes and 8 nodes makes the difference? I would appreciate any pointers.
Thank you in advance.