| Authors: | M. Lopez-Corredoira, F. Sylos Labini, J. Betancort-Rijo |
| Abstract: | AIMS. Several authors have claimed to detect a significant cross-correlation
between microwave WMAP anisotropies and the SDSS galaxy distribution. We repeat
these analyses to determine the different cross-correlation uncertainties
caused by re-sampling errors and field-to-field fluctuations. The first type of
error concerns overlapping sky regions, while the second type concerns
non-overlapping sky regions. METHODS. To measure the re-sampling errors, we use
bootstrap and jack-knife techniques. For the field-to-field fluctuations, we
use three methods: 1) evaluation of the dispersion in the cross-correlation
when correlating separated regions of WMAP with the original region of SDSS; 2)
use of mock Monte Carlo WMAP maps; 3) a new method (developed in this article),
which measures the error as a function of the integral of the product of the
self-correlations for each map. RESULTS. The average cross-correlation for b>30
deg. is significantly stronger than the re-sampling errors--both the jack-knife
and bootstrap techniques provide similar results--but it is of the order of the
field-to-field fluctuations. This is confirmed by the cross-correlation between
anisotropies and galaxies in more than the half of the sample being null within
re-sampling errors. CONCLUSIONS. Re-sampling methods underestimate the errors.
Field-to-field fluctuations dominate the detected signals. The ratio of signal
to re-sampling errors is larger than unity in a way that strongly depends on
the selected sky region. We therefore conclude that there is no evidence yet of
a significant detection of the integrated Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) effect. Hence, the
value of Omega_\Lambda ~ 0.8 obtained by the authors who assumed they were
observing the ISW effect would appear to have originated from noise analysis |
|
[PDF]
[PS] [BibTex] [Bookmark]
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Syksy Rasanen
Joined: 02 Mar 2005
Posts: 128
Affiliation: University of Helsinki
|
 Posted: February 24 2011 |
 |
|
The authors claim that the cross-correlation between the CMB and large-scale structure is not statistically significant. Such a detection is usually interpreted as being due to the ISW effect, which is a prediction of dark energy models. (More generally, any cosmological models other than matter-dominated spatially flat FRW predict an ISW effect, though the quantitative details of course vary.)
The authors consider WMAP5 and SDSS DR7 data. They argue that the intrinsic field-to-field fluctuations are larger than the signal and that thus there is o significant detection. I don't quite follow the analysis, and would be grateful if more knowleadgle people would share their views. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Maciej Bilicki
Joined: 12 May 2010
Posts: 19
Affiliation: University of Cape Town
|
| Posted: February 25 2011 |
|
|
| I'd like to draw your attention to yet another paper where no significant detection of the Sachs-Wolfe effect is claimed, Francis & Peacock (2010) 0909.2494. They cross-correlated CMB with 2MASS. They say even that it might be that the S-W effect could remain undetected in a LambdaCDM universe, even if present! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
SmartFeed
Register
Profile
Log in
![[ Hidden ]](templates/subSilver/images/lang_english/icon_email.gif "[ Hidden ]"){kind=icon}
