CosmoCoffee Forum Index CosmoCoffee

 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch  MemberlistSmartFeed   MemberlistMemberlist    RegisterRegister 
   ProfileProfile   Log inLog in 
Arxiv New Filter | Bookmarks & clubs | Arxiv ref/author:

[1004.4810] Will Multiple Probes of Dark Energy find Modified Gravity?
 
Authors:Charles Shapiro, Scott Dodelson, Ben Hoyle, Lado Samushia, Brenna Flaugher
Abstract:One of the most pressing issues in cosmology is whether general relativity (GR) plus a dark sector is the underlying physical theory or whether a modified gravity model is needed. Upcoming dark energy experiments designed to probe dark energy with multiple methods can address this question by comparing the results of the different methods in constraining dark energy parameters. Disagreement would signal the breakdown of the assumed model (GR plus dark energy). We study the power of this consistency test by projecting constraints in the w_0-w_a plane from the four different techniques of the Dark Energy Survey in the event that the underlying true model is modified gravity. We find that the standard technique of looking for overlap has some shortcomings, propose as an alternative the Multi-dimensional Consistency Test, and introduce the methodology for projecting whether a given experiment will be able to distinguish a modified gravity model from GR.
[PDF] [PS] [BibTex] [Bookmark]

Post new topic   Reply to topic    CosmoCoffee Forum Index -> arXiv papers
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Molly Swanson



Joined: 22 Jun 2009
Posts: 9
Affiliation: University College London

PostPosted: June 24 2010  Reply with quote

This is a very nicely written paper that explores how well upcoming experiments such as the Dark Energy Survey will be able to distinguish between GR+dark energy and modified gravity.

The basic idea is that different probes of dark energy (supernovae, weak lensing, large scale structure, and clusters) depend differently on the growth of structure, so a disagreement between these methods when analyzed assuming GR could provide evidence that gravity needs to be modified. They conclude that the standard method of checking the overlap of error ellipses in the w0-wa plane is not sufficiently sensitive to distinguish their toy modified gravity model from GR, and go on to develop a more sensitive method using the full multi-parameter likelihood space.

The paper also includes a really nice overview of modified gravity parameterizations and Fisher matrix methodology.

Overall I think their multi-dimensional consistency test is a fundamentally simple but powerful formalism that could be applied to many other types of consistency checks as well.
Back to top
View user's profile  
Sarah Bridle



Joined: 24 Sep 2004
Posts: 149
Affiliation: University College London (UCL)

PostPosted: June 26 2010  Reply with quote

Yes, I agree this is a nice illustration of a basic but useful idea, and an interesting development of it.

It would be really nice if there could be a visual way of getting across the effectiveness of the multi-dimensional consistency test, that was similarly powerful to Fig 4 (e.g. some projection in n-d which shows up discrepancies??).
Back to top
View user's profile   Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CosmoCoffee Forum Index -> arXiv papers All times are GMT + 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group. Sponsored by WordWeb online dictionary and dictionary software.