CosmoCoffee Forum Index CosmoCoffee

 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch  MemberlistSmartFeed   MemberlistMemberlist    RegisterRegister 
   ProfileProfile   Log inLog in 
Arxiv New Filter | Bookmarks & clubs | Arxiv ref/author:

[1004.1856] The Hubble Constant
 
Authors:Wendy L. Freedman, Barry F. Madore
Abstract:Considerable progress has been made in determining the Hubble constant over the past two decades. We discuss the cosmological context and importance of an accurate measurement of the Hubble constant, and focus on six high-precision distance-determination methods: Cepheids, tip of the red giant branch, maser galaxies, surface brightness fluctuations, the Tully-Fisher relation and Type Ia supernovae. We discuss in detail known systematic errors in the measurement of galaxy distances and how to minimize them. Our best current estimate of the Hubble constant is 73 +/-2 (random) +/-4 (systematic) km/s/Mpc. The importance of improved accuracy in the Hubble constant will increase over the next decade with new missions and experiments designed to increase the precision in other cosmological parameters. We outline the steps that will be required to deliver a value of the Hubble constant to 2% systematic uncertainty and discuss the constraints on other cosmological parameters that will then be possible with such accuracy.
[PDF] [PS] [BibTex] [Bookmark]

Post new topic   Reply to topic    CosmoCoffee Forum Index -> arXiv papers
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Syksy Rasanen



Joined: 02 Mar 2005
Posts: 127
Affiliation: University of Helsinki

PostPosted: April 15 2010  Reply with quote

This is a nice review of the determination of H0, with an emphasis on methods independent of the cosmological model. The updated HST value is given as 73±2±4 km/s/Mpc, with values from other methods in the same range. (To be contrasted with 0806.3018, which gives 62±1±4 km/s/Mpc, from SNIae, Cepheids and the tip of the red giant branch.)

Cepheids remain an important calibrator for the distance scale, and there is still controversy about metallicity corrections (partly explaining the discrepant numbers mentioned above). One of the improvements reported here is changing the calibration from Cepheids in the Large Magellanic Cloud to Cepheids in our own galaxy. Since the metallicity of these Cepheids is closer to the galaxies where the supernovae used for the determination of H0 reside, this should make the corrections smaller. The authors in fact write that this changes the metallicity corrections from a systematic error to a statistical error, which will decrease as more Cepheids are observed.

There is also a short review on the age of the universe, where I found the CMB discussion to be a bit misleading, because the dependence on the cosmological model is not mentioned (apart from the assumption of spatial flatness).
Back to top
View user's profile [ Hidden ]
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CosmoCoffee Forum Index -> arXiv papers All times are GMT + 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group. Sponsored by WordWeb online dictionary and dictionary software.